home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Ian & Stuart's Australian Mac: Not for Sale
/
Another.not.for.sale (Australia).iso
/
hold me in your arms
/
Nexus
/
nexus.politics
/
priority.nii
< prev
next >
Wrap
Internet Message Format
|
1994-05-22
|
5KB
From: hurst@vistatech.com (Dave Hurst)
Date: Thu, 19 May 94 10:00:43 CDT
Message-Id: <9405191500.AA12812@polaris.vistech>
To: nexus-gaia@netcom.com, nexus-chicago@mcs.com
----- Begin Included Message -----
From: "Whitney, Mara" <MaraW@fs-gate.uchicago.edu>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sender: diac@cpsr.org
From: fepotts@fepco.com (Fred E Potts)
To: Multiple recipients of list <diac@cpsr.org>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I have been reading this listserv as the messages come in, and I think
we are all getting off the track here.
The four large telcos that are going to be operating the so-called
Information Superhighway "cloverleaf system" apparently see it as a
means to provide 500 channels of pay-for-view movies and a home
shopping service. They also see it as a way to pump advertisements
into the home using as a model the current "from us to you" paradigm of
the TV, magazine, and newspaper industries. The thinking is, wide
bandwidth going in (for the ads and movies), and 14.4K going out (so
you can order the movies and products you saw advertised).
For those wanting data, the latest navigation-access method seems to be
to use DOS-Windows-based boxes using Mosaic. This is a high-bandwidth
way to go, and will eat up net bandwidth very rapidly--especially when
multimedia is being used.
What we are getting here is what usually causes wars, a shortage of
resources, and in this situation, guess who is gonna be the loser? :-(
I live in a rural desert area, and do not have local net access
available. I have to use a PPP connection to Alternet using an 800
number line to get access, and my monthly bills run me three times what
"no limit 14.4K use" in NYC would cost. IOW, around $300.00 a month.
Yet, being a writer, I need the net for research purposes, so have to
pay the price. If I can keep my costs to this level, and maintain
access, I will be able to survive (I use Unix--a SPARC 10--from the
shell-prompt, not a DOS-Windows/Mosaic interface, so I am able to keep
my usage fairly efficient).
Unfortunately, most of us do not have the Unix skills or equipment to
operate this way, so we are facing a real bandwidth problem in the near
future.
I would like to point the readers of this list to three papers that can
be obtained by ftp from:
gopher.econ.lsa.umich.edu
1. Economics_of_Internet.ps.Z
2. FAQs.ps.Z
3. Pricing_the_Internet.ps.Z
(Also available in ASCII format from various sources.)
These papers, by the very able Hal R. Varian (whose conclusions I do
not agree with, but whose work I admire greatly) should open the eyes
of those who are not familiar with these issues.
Pat Hayes has it right: let's get the so-called "Information Super-
highway" built and operating with reasonable access along the lines of
the Internet, then worry about raising the education level of the
masses. Since we have long had universal schooling, and still have
widespread illiteracy, we have to face up to the unpleasant fact that
there are large numbers of people that are not only unable to read and
write beyond the basic "get a driver's license" level, but are not
interested in learning to read or write. These people are not going to
be able to understand data files; they are not even able to separate
the fact from fiction in the advertisements they are bombarded with
daily on TV. So, let's not waste our time and energy worrying about
them now, let's get the "Superhighway" infrastructure in place, prevent
the net from being taken over by the commercial interests, prevent
ourselves from being totally blocked from use of the net due to pric-
ing, prevent the shutting down of ftp, W3, and gopher sites because of
the "packet pricing scheme", keep the freedom of email and listservs,
and go from there.
IOW, first things first. If we dissipate our focus and energies
worrying about liberal social agendas at this point, we will lose all
access to the net, and then everybody loses. You have to face it,
information is always going to be an "elitist" commodity, for only the
truly educated can use it. A person who cannot read, write, or even
set the clock on his/her VCR isn't likely to understand logical
discussion, but will be operating on emotion anyway. There is little
we can do in the near term about this problem, so let's face the
immediate problem and not run around like chickens with their heads
cut off as the large telcoms close in on us.
Regards...
Fred
--
fepotts@fepco.com
----- End Included Message -----